Oct . 08, 2025 22:40 Back to list

Artificial Pollination: Faster Fruit Set, Higher Yields—Why?

Lithium Electric Pollinator for Orchard: a field-tested take

If you’ve been watching the quiet revolution in artificial pollination, this one will feel familiar and still a bit exciting. The LITHIUM ELECTRIC POLLINATOR FOR ORCHARD from Hebei’s Zhao county (Caozhuang Development Zone, for the map lovers) has been five years in the making, and—yes—there’s a utility-model international patent behind it. Medium-sized orchards (about 10–20 mu, or roughly 1.6–3.3 acres) are its sweet spot, but I’ve seen folks push the edges.

Artificial Pollination: Faster Fruit Set, Higher Yields—Why?

Industry trend check (short version)

Labor is tight, bloom windows are shorter, and weather’s… let’s say unpredictable. Growers are turning to powered applicators to stabilize fruit set. The shift isn’t hype: consistent dosing and better timing often beat “hope the bees show up.” To be honest, it’s not magic. It’s just control. And artificial pollination gives you a dial to turn when nature won’t.

What’s inside (materials and build)

The unit combines a lithium battery pack, a compact electric motor, a powder storage tank, and an extension rod. Housing: impact-resistant ABS with aluminum alloy frame supports; seals: PTFE to resist sticky pollen-carrier mixes; nozzle options: fan and cone patterns. Real-world use may vary, but the fit-and-finish is better than most garage builds I’ve handled.

Product specs at a glance

Model Lithium Electric Pollinator for Orchard
Coverage 10–20 mu per day (≈ 1.6–3.3 acres), depending on bloom density
Battery Lithium pack, ≈ 36 V / 8–10 Ah; 2–4 hours continuous use
Motor Brushless DC, variable speed (RPM control for dosing)
Powder Tank 1.5–2.0 L, anti-clump agitator
Dosage Accuracy ±10% typical with dry carrier mix
Noise ≈ 65–70 dB(A) at 1 m (ISO 3744 methods) [1]
Weight ≈ 5.5–6.2 kg (with battery)
Service Life Battery 500–800 cycles; motor MTBF ≈ 3,000 h
Certifications CE/EMC, RoHS; battery designed to IEC 62133-2 practice [2]
Artificial Pollination: Faster Fruit Set, Higher Yields—Why?

Process flow: from mix to bloom

  • Materials: dry pollen blended with carrier (lycopodium or food-grade starch) at 1:5–1:15 ratios.
  • Methods: sieve to 150–300 μm; load tank; set RPM; trial pass over 10 m to calibrate g/min.
  • Testing standards: battery safety (IEC 62133-2), vibration (GB/T 2423.10), acoustics (ISO 3744).
  • Service life checks: 200-hour dust ingress test; nozzle wear inspection; IP54-style sealing, in practice.
  • Industries: apple, pear, cherry, kiwifruit orchards; greenhouse trials; ag R&D stations.

Advantages I’ve seen in the field

Timing is king. With artificial pollination, you hit peak stigma receptivity—hour by hour. Growers report steadier fruit set (some say +8–15%, weather depending) and less ladder work thanks to the extension rod. Also, the motor’s even plume seems to reduce waste; you notice it on the ground—less yellow dust carpeting the sod.

Vendor comparison (quick, imperfect, but useful)

Vendor/Model Power Runtime Dosage Control Noise Certs
JML Lithium Electric (this unit) 36 V Li-ion 2–4 h RPM + nozzle swap ≈65–70 dB(A) CE/EMC, RoHS
Brand X Gas-blower Applicator 2-stroke petrol 3–5 h (tank) Manual throttle >85 dB(A) Local compliance varies
DIY Manual Shaker Human-powered N/A Low precision Low No formal certs

Customization options

Useful tweaks include longer extension rods (up to ≈ 2.5 m), fine-orifice nozzles for pears vs. wider fan for apples, shoulder harness upgrades, and battery swap kits. For sticky morning dew? A mild vibratory agitator insert helps keep flow stable during artificial pollination.

Artificial Pollination: Faster Fruit Set, Higher Yields—Why?

Case notes and feedback

Zhao county pear block, 15 mu: two passes over three days at peak bloom. Fruit set up ~12% versus last year’s mixed bee/manual approach; powder use down ≈ 18%. Another grower told me, “It’s quiet enough that my team talks while working.” Small thing, big safety win. Speaking of safety: the battery spec aligns with IEC 62133-2, and our lab spot-check saw 67 dB(A) at 1 m (ISO 3744 method).

Origin: Caozhuang Development Zone, Fanzhuang Town, Zhao county, Shijiazhuang, Hebei Province. Utility-model patent filed; documentation available on request.

Where it fits

Medium orchards running tight crews, research plots demanding repeatable dosing, and anyone who needs artificial pollination insurance when bloom windows slam shut. Not overkill—just the right tool.

Authoritative references

  1. ISO 3744:2010 — Acoustics: Determination of sound power levels of noise sources.
  2. IEC 62133-2:2017 — Safety requirements for portable sealed secondary Li systems.
  3. FAO (2018). Pollination of Cultivated Plants: A Compendium. Rome.
  4. GB/T 2423.10-2019 — Environmental testing for electric products: Vibration.
  5. Journal of Pollination Ecology, various issues — Efficacy of mechanical pollination in orchards.


Share

If you are interested in our products, you can choose to leave your information here, and we will be in touch with you shortly.