Last autumn I walked the rows in Zhao county, listening to growers talk about yield, color, residue limits—the real stuff. The humble fruit paper bags they were using looked simple, but the tech inside them isn’t. This model—officially, “FRUIT PAPER BAGS FOR PREVENTING INSECTS AND PESTICIDE RESIDUES IN ORCHARDS”—comes out of the Caozhuang Development Zone, Fanzhuang Town, Zhao county, Shijiazhuang, Hebei Province. On paper (pun intended), they reduce disease, cut pesticide exposure, and brighten the fruit’s skin tone by enhancing anthocyanin development. In practice, the results are surprisingly consistent.
Two converging trends: stricter MRLs (maximum residue limits) in export markets, and retailers benchmarking cosmetic quality harder than ever. Bagging shifts the game. It’s not just about pest exclusion; it’s about surface finish, reduced wind rub, and safer transport. Many customers say the lot-to-lot consistency improves, which buyers actually notice.
The team shared bench numbers from recent lots. I’ll paraphrase—field results always wiggle a bit, to be honest.
| Spec | Typical Value | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Paper weight | 45–60 gsm | ISO 186 |
| Cobb60 water absorbency | ≤ 35 g/m² | ISO 535 |
| Air permeability | 20–50 s (Gurley) | ISO 5636‑5 |
| Tensile (MD/CD) | ≥ 3.0/1.5 kN/m | ISO 1924‑2 |
| UV shading | ≈85–95% | Helps color development |
You can spec flap style, micro‑perfs, inner black layer, and single‑color branding. For many orchards, fruit paper bags sized 180×250 mm (apple/pear) or 220×300 mm work best.
| Model | Size (mm) | Layers | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| FPB-180 | 180×250 | 1–2 | Apple, early-season pear |
| FPB-220 | 220×300 | 2 | Late pear, peach |
| FPB-280 | 280×380 | 2 | Mango/pomegranate |
| Vendor | MOQ | Lead Time | Certs | Customization | Indicative Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JML (Hebei) | 10k pcs | 10–20 days | GB 4806.8, ISO 9001 | Size/print/perfs | $$ (mid) |
| Vendor A (Zhejiang) | 20k pcs | 15–25 days | ISO 9001 | Size only | $ (low) |
| Importer B (EU) | 5k pcs | Stock/fast | EU 1935/2004 | Branding | $$$ (high) |
Hebei apple blocks using fruit paper bags reported ≈30–50% fewer cosmetic defects (wind rub/insect blemish) and measurable reductions in detectable residues at harvest compared with non-bagged controls. One manager told me, “We used fewer sprays late season, and the peel stayed clean after storms.” Storage bruising also trended down, which I didn’t fully expect, but it tracks with less pre‑harvest abrasion.
For buyers: request DoC to GB 4806.8 and migration testing aligned to EU 1935/2004 (plus FDA 21 CFR 176.170 if exporting to the U.S.). Some lines offer compostable components targeting EN 13432/ASTM D6400; verify lot by lot. As always, fruit paper bags don’t replace good IPM—they just make it easier to meet retailer specs without over‑spraying.
References